1. Which transactions fall under the scope of the new rules?
The following transactions require ministerial approval (and thus may not be implemented before such approval is granted) under Act LVII of 2018, the Security Review Act – SRA):
The SRA only applies to foreign investors, which are defined as any natural person or legal entity resident/registered in a country outside of the EU, EEA or Switzerland (Foreign Investor).
In addition, even a “non-foreign” legal entity wishing to engage in a relevant transaction can fall under the scope of the SRA, if a Foreign Investor has majority control (under Hungarian civil law) over that “non-foreign” legal entity (Indirect Foreign Investor).
The SRA only applies if the current or planned activities of the Hungarian target company relate to certain strategic activities as listed in the SRA and then specifically listed in the SRA's implementing decree (Strategic Activities). These are activities typically relevant to national security, such as defence, dual use products, cryptography and wire-tapping products, government IT services as well as key services in the financial, energy and telecoms sectors.
The SRA becomes applicable if case any of the following triggering events under a), b) or c) occur.
A Foreign Investor
2. What is the procedure and the substantive basis for a decision?
A transaction where the above three criteria are met has to be notified to the competent minister before implementation. The deadline for notification is typically 10 days from the date of signing (e.g. in case a civil law agreement forming the basis of a transaction).
The notification shall be reviewed by the minister responsible for civil national security services - the Minister for the Interier - within 60 days (extendable by 60 days) from the date of filing. The minister has the power to block a transaction provided that it “harms Hungary’s security interests”. In case of Indirect Foreign Investors, a blocking decision can only be made, however, if it can be established that the transaction aims to obscure or prevent the possibility to inspect the possible harm to Hungary’s security (i.e. to circumvent the screening rules). This could be the case, in particular, if the “non-foreign” entity can be considered as a mere “vehicle” or “shell”, ie where it does not carry out any actual economic activities.
The blocking decision may only be challenged in front of courts due to a serious procedural breach (with the exception of the blocking decision for Indirect Foreign Investors, where substantive issues may also be relied upon). As a result, the SRA does not allow a Foreign Investor to challenge the minister’s conclusions on substantive grounds, i.e., on the basis that transaction would not “harm Hungary’s security interests”.
3. Are there any sanctions non-compliance?
If an otherwise notifiable transaction is implemented in the lack of or contrary to a ministerial decision, a fine shall be imposed. The amount of the fine may be up to HUF 10 million (approx. EUR 30.000) for legal entities and HUF 1 million (approx. EUR 3.000) in case of private individuals.
In addition, if no prior screening was made, the competent minister shall also make a decision on the merits of the transaction. This entails that even if the transaction was not notified, it may still receive an approval if the relevant national security criteria are met.
If, however, the transaction is rejected after implementation, the minister has the right to impose remedies on the Foreign Investor, which may include the forced selling of the relevant shareholding, the liquidation of the target and a modification of the scope of activities. If the Foreign Investor is obliged to sell the shareholding, the Hungarian State has a pre-emption right.
Importantly, there is also a time-limit for intervention: the right for intervention lapses if the case if not pursued by the minister within 6 months of becoming aware of the breach or if 5 years have passed since the transaction has been implemented.